Saab Crisis: shock therapy in Stockholm

Shock therapy is the word of the week. So yesterday my friend from Stockholm called the events at the beginning of the week in Stockholm. For Youngman's delegation, he says, it was a shock to suddenly face the sheer bankruptcy risk.

In the bargaining marathon of the past few weeks, one had lost sight of reality over all the contracts and legal intricacies. Presumably, Youngman first thought of a new round of poker when the bad bankruptcy word came on the table.

The shock therapy seems to have been beneficial, says our Swedish friend. Because now everything could go very quickly and you could concentrate on the essential things. The climate of the negotiations has also changed noticeably, everything is more open and positive than in the past few days The construction for the Saab rescue has charm and opportunity. Because it, he says, does not require approval from any side. Not from General Motors, not from the EIB, the government in Stockholm, and not from the NDRC either. (Note: I'm still a little skeptical about that)

The confidence that the reconstruction could be carried on has increased significantly. This is of course due to the honorable departure of Lofalk, who still has to appear in court on Monday, and the entry of the new administrator at.

Today is Thursday. The deadline is Monday, 13: 00 clock. Victor Muller and Rachel Pang will appear before the court in Vänersborg and deliver their statements. The most important person of the next few days is Rachel Pang, everything is on her now. She and her delegation have to create facts by the time they go to court. Wages and salaries should be paid and Saab's account must be solvent.

Only then will the court judge the case of Saab sympathetically. A demolition of the reconstruction and a bankruptcy are otherwise likely. We'll see how Youngman will solve these problems.

Yesterday, the People's Republic of China took a step to symbolically strengthen the domestic auto industry. Maybe to send a small warning across the pond to the gentlemen in Detroit. Cars built in the US will be punished. BMW should pay for the US production 2.0%, Daimler 2.7% and Chrysler 8.8%. GM has come up with a whopping 12.9%.

The number is purely symbolic, because in the US GM does not produce anything that could somehow interest the world. Or does an attractive GM model with production location USA come to mind? Not me. The Saab 9-4x derivative from Cadillac is being rolled off the line in Mexico and is therefore not affected by the penalty.

Even so, it is a shot in front of the bow for the accountants in Detroit and maybe a return coach because it hinders and prevents Chinese investment in Sweden. Let's see if they interpret the characters correctly.

Text: tom@saabblog.net

11 thoughts on "Saab Crisis: shock therapy in Stockholm"

  • blank

    The GM BUICK models to be purchased in China will be used by GM Shanghai (joint venture with
    SAIC) and do not fall under the import tariffs for complete vehicles

  • blank

    It can be assumed that nobody in China starts a 100 million business without someone important nodding. How short-sighted does a CEO have to be when, after having been rescued with Chinese money, otherwise the USA doesn't have it, then he is gambling for a few percent. It was only a matter of time before the “God Father” in Detroit was told where Bartel got the must. Couldn't it be that the good merchants in China get a little more money from GM's customs than they are supposed to pay in licenses? That would be a real punchline: to pay GM its claims with GM money. The champagne corks pop. (Or whatever else you drink in China.) You don't have to be a strategist to become CEO of GM. The SAAB past has shown that.

    • blank

      In the land of unlimited possibilities, few have understood that the supremacy of white men is slowly but surely a thing of the past ...

  • blank

    For the production of GM vehicles one more question regarding the Buicks to be acquired in China: Where are these models produced? Are not they from America?

    I heard from a friend that GM sells around 200000 vehicles a year in China - where are they all produced? The assumption that these import duties are only a symbolic number does not apply to all GM products. Is there more information here?

    Joachim

  • blank

    "Greetings from Hildesheim!"

    clear case of too thick fingers, that's right:

    Greetings from Hildesheim!

    : )

  • blank

    "Today is Friday."

    So in Hildesheim is still Thursday.

    Thanks for the ongoing coverage. After the new news, some hope germinates, hopefully not unfounded.

    Keep it up,

    Grü0e from Hildesheim!

    • blank

      Oops, that's how it works, thought Thursday - written Friday 😉. Don't worry, Thursday is not only in Hildesheim. Thank you !

    • blank

      Another Hildesheimer! 🙂
      Which Saab do you drive? I'm on the road with a black 9-3 II Vector (but I know at least one more here in town).

      And of course, a thank you to the Saabblog team for the great coverage.

      • blank

        Hallo,

        white 9-3 II BioPower Vector Cabriolet, MY 2008, I haven't seen another one with HI.

        • blank

          Hm, a white convertible I have not noticed here yet. But I will keep my eyes open and possibly wave violently

  • blank

    This title of today's blog article hits the mark! Now the whole story becomes a plaything between the USA and China and who wins? Certainly not the dealers and customers. And certainly not car brand SAAB ......

Comments are closed.